Have I Overemphasized Baptism?
For more than thirty years I have preached immersion in water as an essential act of obedience for those who wish to be saved. I have proclaimed Jesus as the “author of eternal salvation to all who obey Him” (Heb. 5:9), and taught baptism as one of the things Jesus com-mands. Through the years I have concluded very few sermons without at least some effort to exhort any who have not been baptized to do that very thing, but have I been mistaken? My evangelical friends and neighbors have always insisted I was wrong to insist upon the necessity of baptism, but increasingly there are some within churches of Christ who either openly minimize the necessity of baptism, or at least suggest we should be talking about it less. Some go so far as to say we are majoring in minors with our emphasis on baptism; while others simply say we need to deemphasize it a little and talk about other things more.
What should I do? Should I repent of my “overemphasis of a Church of Christ Tradition?” Should I stop being so emphatic about linking baptism and salvation? Before answering those questions, we need to carefully consider the following.
If Jesus linked an action to His authority, discipleship, and the observation of His commands, should we emphasize that thing? In fact, He did that very thing with baptism in Matt. 28:18-20. “And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, ‘All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.’ Amen.”
If the Lord Jesus Christ, the very epitome of grace, were to associate a physical act with being saved would it not be wrong to fail to stress its importance to all who would hear? Though many contend some of us have overemphasized baptism, it was the risen Savior who linked baptism to salvation in Mark 16:16. “He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned.”
Take a moment to compare the following two verses which mention the remission of sins. “For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins” (Matt. 26:28). “Then Peter said to them, ‘Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit’” (Acts 2:38). It seems more than a little strange to realize all who claim to believe the words of the New Testament agree the blood of Jesus should be emphasized, but many of those same people will turn around and deny the importance of baptism, an act said to have the same intended purpose. To deemphasize baptism is to deemphasize the remission of sins, and to deemphasize the remission of sins is to deemphasize the shedding of Christ’s blood.
If we learned from the New Testament a man fasted and prayed for three days and then was told he could wash away his sins in baptism, would that cause baptism to take on a greater importance in our eyes? The story of Saul’s conversion is found in both Acts 9 and Acts 22, and it is in Acts 22:16 that we read of a certain disciple named Ananias saying the following, “And now why are you waiting? Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord.”
Would it be right to deemphasize an action said to be “into Christ Jesus” and “into His death?” Consider carefully the implications Rom. 6:3 has on this question about the relative importance of baptism. “Or do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death?” From this passage could we not reasonably argue that to minimize baptism is to minimize Christ Jesus and His death?
Before deciding it is okay to downplay baptism, we should also consider Gal. 3:26, 27—“For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ.” And I think it would be appropriate to allow one of the Lord’s apostles to weigh in with the following from 1 Pet. 3:21, “There is also an antitype which now saves us—baptism (not the removal of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God), through the resurrection of Jesus Christ….”
Let’s ask the questions again.
What should I do? I should strive to preach the “whole counsel of God” (Acts 20:27) which clearly includes the message baptism is essential. Certainly I must preach God’s grace and mercy, and I must teach all things He has commanded (Matt. 28:20), but I cannot cease preaching baptism and still please the One who possesses all authority.
Should I repent of the overemphasis of a “Church of Christ Tradition?” To dismiss baptism with such a prejudicial epithet is to ignore the words of Jesus, along with those of His apostles and prophets. Baptism is not a church tradition, but a divine command.
Should I stop being so emphatic about linking baptism and salvation? The truth is I am not the one who linked the two—Jesus did. “Saved,” “remission of sins,” “wash away your sins,” and “saves” are not my words, but the words of Scripture.
If you have never been baptized for the remission of your sins and thereby entered into and put on Christ, why don’t you? Please do not be misled; baptism is not a Church of Christ Tradition, but a vital part of God’s plan for you.
Unless noted, all quotations from the New King James Version, copyright 1994, Thomas Nelson, Inc.